From Owen Jones To OpenAI: Finding The Mudo In Times Of Accelerated Change

Picture Owen Jones in 1851, standing before the Great Exhibition's glittering palace of iron and glass, watching the world's first global showcase of industrial might. While others marveled at steam engines and mechanical looms, Jones was studying something else entirely—the patterns carved into ivory combs from India, the rhythmic geometries of Persian carpets, the flowing curves of Chinese porcelain. These objects carried crystallized intelligence, ways of thinking made visible through centuries of human hands working with materials.

 

Join upcoming events.

〰️

Dream new patterns with kindred spirits!

Join upcoming events. 〰️ Dream new patterns with kindred spirits!

 

Jones was witnessing the same moment we occupy now: the tender negotiation between what our hands remember and what acceleration demands of us. What if the ornamental traditions we're drawn to offer more than nostalgic escape—what if they teach us how to become porous again, how to soften and shed what no longer serves while remaining open to what wants to emerge?

Key Threads

Key questions this article explores:

  • How do ornamental traditions offer grounding practices for times of technological acceleration?

  • What wisdom do Art Nouveau, Rococo, and Arts & Crafts movements hold for finding quiet in digital chaos?

  • Why might pattern-making be essential intelligence for navigating unprecedented change?

  • How do we honor handmade rebellion while remaining open to new creative possibilities?

 

The Grammar Of Presence

Jones spent his twenties traveling through Egypt and Spain, copying architectural details with obsessive precision. But something happened when he reached the Alhambra in Granada. The mathematical perfection of Islamic geometric patterns broke open his Victorian assumptions about how beauty works. These patterns functioned as visual algorithms, rule-based systems that could generate infinite complexity from simple principles.

His Grammar of Ornament became the first attempt to reverse-engineer the world's visual languages. Jones realized that every culture had developed sophisticated methods for organizing overwhelming complexity into comprehensible beauty. The spiraling growth patterns of Islamic designs, the interlaced rhythms of Celtic knotwork, the abundant naturalism of Indian textiles—each tradition encoded solutions to the same fundamental human challenge: how to create order without rigidity, complexity without chaos.

"The principles discoverable in the works of the past belong to us; not so the results," Jones wrote, teaching us to look beneath style to structure. He was developing what we'd now call pattern recognition—the ability to extract underlying organizing principles from surface appearances. When Jones classified ornamental systems according to their geometric construction and color relationships, he was creating something unprecedented: a taxonomy of visual intelligence.

Standing in our current flood of AI-generated imagery, Jones's approach feels startlingly contemporary. He faced the same challenge we do—how to maintain human meaning-making when new technologies threaten to overwhelm traditional ways of creating. His solution wasn't to reject innovation but to understand the deeper principles that have always guided human visual thinking, ensuring that technological capability serves rather than replaces embodied wisdom.

Sources:

  • The Grammar of Ornament (1856)

  • Plans, Elevations, Sections and Details of the Alhambra (1842-1845)

  • Victorian Design Reform Movement

  • British Museum Oriental Collections

 
The principles discoverable in the works of the past belong to us; not so the results. It is taking the end for the means.
— Owen Jones
 

The Arts And Crafts Movement's Handmade Rebellion

Morris could see the future in a cotton mill. Standing among the mechanical looms of Manchester in the 1870s, watching skilled weavers reduced to machine tenders, he glimpsed what industrialization would ultimately demand: the complete separation of thinking from making, design from execution, head from hand. Perhaps what we recognize in his response is our own process of grieving—the necessary softening that comes when we realize something we've held rigid must learn to bend.

Morris staged what might be history's most meditative rebellion. He understood that after you become something—a master craftsman, an established way of working—you need to deconstruct into something softer to learn again, to become porous enough for new possibilities. His workshops became spaces for this kind of patient shedding, places where makers could release their attachment to familiar methods while staying connected to the deeper intelligence of hand and material.

The Arts and Crafts communities that sprouted across Britain and America operated as laboratories for what we might call "conscious technology." C.R. Ashbee's Guild of Handicraft in London's East End, the Roycroft artisan community in East Aurora, Morris's own workshops at Red House—these experiments in integration proved that mechanization could amplify rather than replace human creativity, that efficiency could serve beauty rather than dominating it.

When Morris spent weeks hand-carving a single woodblock for printing wallpaper, he practiced what Richard Sennett calls "intelligent hand"—a way of staying open, permeable, responsive to what materials and tools wanted to teach him. In our current chaos of digital acceleration, this kind of patient repetition offers something profound: permission to soften, to become beginners again, to let our certainties dissolve into something more adaptive.

Sources:

 

Nourishing Twirls And Curves

Madame de Pompadour kept a private workshop at Versailles where she painted porcelain. Her workshop served as cultural strategy—in the midst of Louis XV's rigidly geometric court, she nurtured the organic sensibilities that would eventually bloom into Rococo. The movement emerged from a collective exhaustion with Baroque's overwhelming grandeur, a longing for something more intimate, playful, responsive to natural rhythms rather than imperial power.

Rococo artists discovered that the most sophisticated mathematical relationships in nature express themselves through seemingly effortless grace. The shell spirals that decorated their ceramics, the flowering vines that covered their wallpapers, the asymmetrical curves that shaped their furniture—these explorations revealed what happens when human creation follows life's own organizing principles rather than imposing abstract geometric order.

A century and a half later, Art Nouveau artists made a similar discovery. Standing in the machine age's early decades, watching cities fill with iron and steel, they found in natural forms the visual languages that could humanize industrial production. Hector Guimard's Paris Metro entrances bloomed like cast-iron flowers from sidewalk corners. Louis Comfort Tiffany developed entirely new glassmaking techniques to capture the exact quality of light filtering through leaves. Victor Horta let the structural logic of iron beams express itself through botanical curves that made buildings feel alive.

Both movements intuited what we're now learning scientifically: that organic forms aren't chaotic but follow sophisticated organizational principles that our brains are evolutionarily designed to find both beautiful and comprehensible. Their commitment to natural patterns expressed practical wisdom about how to create environments that nourish rather than exhaust human consciousness. In our current moment of digital acceleration, their example offers guidance for ensuring that our tools serve life rather than abstracting us away from it.

Sources:

 
 

Pattern Languages For Uncertain Times

Christopher Alexander spent decades trying to solve an impossible problem: how to encode the wisdom that created traditional villages, medieval towns, and vernacular buildings into principles that contemporary architects could use without merely copying historical styles. His solution, A Pattern Language, reads like a field guide to human spatial intelligence—253 interconnected observations about how built environments can support rather than undermine human flourishing.

Alexander's patterns function less like architectural rules than like a living vocabulary for design thinking. When he writes about "Light on Two Sides of Every Room" or "Something Roughly in the Middle," he's articulating principles that traditional builders knew intuitively but that modernist education had systematically forgotten. Each pattern describes not what to build but how to recognize the conditions under which beauty and functionality emerge naturally from the relationship between human needs and environmental possibilities.

This approach proves surprisingly relevant to current explorations in AI-assisted design. The most successful algorithmic systems turn out to be those that learn from human pattern recognition rather than trying to replace it entirely. Tools like Midjourney and DALL-E are most powerful when they help us explore variations on themes that have always organized human visual thinking—the interplay between symmetry and asymmetry, the tension between order and surprise, the endless fascination of growth patterns that appear throughout natural and cultural forms.

Contemporary researchers working at the intersection of AI and traditional craft are rediscovering what Alexander always insisted: that intelligence isn't about generating novelty but about recognizing and nurturing the patterns through which beauty emerges. Books like The V&A Sourcebook of Pattern and Ornament continue documenting these patterns, while movements in biomimicry, parametric design, and open-source making carry forward the insight that the most sophisticated technologies are those that work with rather than against the organizational principles that have always guided human creation.

This understanding points toward something we might call the Mudo—a way of working that honors both the patient intelligence of traditional making and the generative possibilities of new tools, finding the quiet space where meaningful creation can emerge.

Sources:

 

The Mudo

I'd like to propose that we call this period we are living through the Mudo. In Spanish, "mudo" means mute or silent, but not from inability—rather from choice or profound feeling that exceeds words. Handcraft is often wordless communication, the knowledge that passes through fingers, the conversations between maker and material that happen below the threshold of language. "Mudo" suggests a deliberate quietness in response to digital noise, a chosen silence that's actually full of meaning. Unlike English "mute" (which suggests disability or forced silence), Spanish "mudo" can imply wisdom, discretion, or depth of feeling. It's the silence of contemplation, not emptiness. There's also "mundo" (world) echoing within it—suggesting a quiet world, an alternative to the loud digital sphere.

We inhabit this Mudo as a time when the tender negotiation between inherited ways of making and tools of unprecedented power asks us to become porous in new ways. The longing so many of us feel for handmade objects, for spaces marked by human intention, for the particular aliveness that emerges through patient repetition—this recognition points toward something essential we're learning to hold more lightly.

Perhaps crafts help us navigate this necessary softening—teaching us how to shed what we've outgrown while remaining open to what wants to emerge. This openness, this willingness to become permeable and capable of change, suggests something alive and breathing in our approach to making. Watch someone doodling in a meeting margin, arranging objects on a shelf, choosing which mug to use for morning coffee. These seemingly trivial acts connect us to a way of being that stays fluid, responsive, willing to be surprised by what emerges from the tender negotiation between intention and material, between what we know and what we're learning.

The ornamental traditions offer tested strategies for navigating this moment. Like Morris learning to use synthetic dyes while maintaining hand-printing techniques, like Art Nouveau artists employing industrial materials while honoring organic forms, we're discovering how to work with AI while preserving the essentially human activities of material exploration, rhythmic repetition, and decorative dreaming. The key insight from all these historical precedents is that successful integration requires neither wholesale embrace nor blanket rejection of new technologies but conscious, creative relationship with them.

Perhaps our role in this emerging landscape is to become skilled at this kind of porousness—learning to work with AI not as replacement or threat but as part of the ongoing process of shedding and opening that has always characterized meaningful making. As algorithmic systems become more sophisticated, we might function as guides in the art of staying soft, of maintaining the kind of responsive intelligence that emerges only through patient engagement with uncertainty, with materials that teach us as we work with them.

Sources:

  • Contemporary AI-Art Research

  • Digital Fabrication Communities

  • Modern Craft Revival Movements

 

Woven Wisdom

Truth worth holding onto:

  1. Pattern as Intelligence: Ornamental traditions developed sophisticated visual languages for organizing complex information and maintaining human meaning-making during periods of rapid change—offering essential frameworks for our AI moment.

    Embodied Resistance: The Arts and Crafts movement's handmade rebellion wasn't anti-technology but pro-consciousness, insisting on deliberate relationship with tools and materials as a way of preserving human agency in mechanized times.

    Organic Integration: Art Nouveau and Rococo understood that the most successful responses to rigid systems come through rediscovering natural patterns and life principles—guidance for ensuring AI serves beauty rather than replacing it.

 

The Mudo Toolkit

  1. Quiet Making Practice: Choose something repetitive that requires your hands—sketching, clay work, simple embroidery. Practice it regularly as digital acceleration happens around you. Notice what emerges in the wordless dialogue between your intention and the material's resistance. Document insights that arise not from thinking but from the rhythm of making.

  2. Silent Pattern Study: Select a traditional ornamental form that draws you without needing to understand why. Trace its underlying rhythms rather than copying its surface. What organizing intelligence guided its makers through their fingers? How might this wordless knowledge inform your relationship with contemporary tools?

  3. Tender Integration: Rather than viewing AI as replacement or enemy, explore it as Morris explored synthetic dyes—quietly, critically, with your hands still connected to traditional methods. What happens when you guide algorithmic systems toward outcomes that honor the contemplative silence from which meaningful making emerges?

 

The thread connecting Owen Jones's systematic approach to beauty, the Arts and Crafts movement's meditative rebellion, and Art Nouveau's organic integration runs directly through our contemporary Mudo—this necessary softening when powerful new technologies ask us to reconsider everything we thought we knew about making and creating.

This movement we call the Mudo suggests that the future belongs not to those who either embrace or reject AI wholesale, but to those who approach it as part of the ongoing practice of softening rigid approaches to technology and making—staying open to what wants to emerge while honoring what serves life and gently releasing what no longer does. In learning to work with artificial intelligence as these movements worked with industrial technology—through patient negotiation rather than rigid resistance—we participate in the eternal human practice of shedding and opening, ensuring that technological acceleration serves the tender, responsive, essentially human process of creating meaning through beauty.

 

 

Upcoming Events

Ready to dive deeper? Join our community of master artisans, cultural stewards, and creative practitioners exploring the intersection of traditional craft and contemporary life. Classes, intensives, and ceremonial gatherings across LA and online for artists, designers, crafters, illustrators, and makers of all backgrounds and levels. Our programs unite ancient wisdom with contemporary practice, cultivating living heritage through embodied craft, storytelling through making, communion with nature, cultural preservation, meditative practice, and the celebration of life's luminous beauty.

 

#mudo #ornamentalwisdom #handmaderebellion #patternlanguage #owenjones #grammarofornament #williammorris #artsandcrafts #artnouveau #rococo #craftandai #embodiedmaking #digitalquiet #contemporarycraft #patternrecognition #tendernegotiation #porousmaking #slowtech #makingmeaning #christopheralexander #ornamentaltraditions

Previous
Previous

Shoebox Arts: Folk Lounge And Finding Your People

Next
Next

Talk For The Wende, Pixels To Petals: How Ancient Symbols Travel Through Time And Technology